BrokenSwordS
2009-08-17 |  | Updates and stuff |  |
due to the overwhelming disagreement with the changing of the torumaline we have opted instead for a small nerf to the tourmaline where it will keep its firepower and we also have came up with possible improvement for G.Agate
Tourmaline
K: 8,000 > 8,000
Hull: 15,000 > 10,000
R: 4 > 4
No Retal > No Retal
Scanner: 250 > 500
Upkeep: 720 > 700
PR: 6,510 > 6,510
BR: 4 > 4
ES: -50 > 30
KS: 50 > -40
MS: -40 >-50
CS: 40 > 50
G.Agate
E: 0 > 3,500
K: 5,000 3,000
Hull: 25,000 > 25,000
Scanner: 2,700 > 2,700
Upkeep: 1,712 > 1,712
No Retal > No Retal
Range 4 > 5
BR: 4 > 4
ES: 99 > 99
KS: -30 > -30
MS: -20 > -20
CS: -20 > -10
Edited by BrokenSwordS on 2009-08-17 |
|
Bonehunters
99+ day(s) ago | Nope not good enough, you haven`t done enough to make it really hard for guards |
Squaks
99+ day(s) ago | most hit guards on aggressive, guess i missed a comma or something in my first post |
PistolPete
99+ day(s) ago | Most guards hits on aggressive?!
Anyway.. Before all the guard ships were upgraded they were a pain in the ass. All these changes can`t have made that better. |
Labratmaze1
99+ day(s) ago | when will these changes happen ? |
Squaks
99+ day(s) ago | when attacking yea, but thats not the problem lol since most hit guards on aggressive and anything queens hit are wiped, unless i am spamming |
LordaeroN
99+ day(s) ago | Erhm..Squaks,like 80% of your ships can beat queens and kings on careful/normal :p |
Squaks
99+ day(s) ago | i am liking the tourms, we might actually have a ship to fight against queens and kings now |
Archaeoptyrex
99+ day(s) ago | that`s perfectly fine --
tourm`s still an awesome ship -- but good idea -- hercs own much more now vs tourm -- good job!
w/e to the agate ... it`s a bit better |
ArchAng3l
99+ day(s) ago | the agate is good.. able to fill in the role of 2weapon amethyst which have since become energy ship... the tom look good too... |
