EphemeralEternity
2009-08-13 |  | Updates, Herr Schooner |  |
We, the people of your staff....have created two versions of the Schooner, one is a traditional energy kinetic version, the other is a energy missile version.
both are posted here for you to review, test and comment on. The reason for posting two concepts it to allow you, the player the chance to vote on which prototype you`d rather see become the incarnation of the new schooner. The one that gets the most positive feed back and general overall approval will likely be the new schooner of choice
Remember you don`t have to vote for either one, you always have the option of keeping the current
Changes courtesy of: EphemeralEternity, BrokenSwordS, Deiloche, Raistlin, God and a few other individuals.
R.Schooner
E: 300 > 850
K: 300 > 200
Hull: 3,000 > 2,500
R: 9 > 9
Scanner: 100 > 220
Upkeep: 454 > 502
PR: 2,036 > 2,256
BR:12 > 8
ES: -30 > -50
KS: 60 > 70
MS: 40 >0
CS: 0 > -10
R.Schooner
E: 300 >900
K: 300 > 0
M: 0 > 250
Hull: 3,000 > 2,500
R: 9 > 9
Scanner: 100 > 170
Upkeep: 454 > 476
PR: 2,036 > 2,136
BR:12 > 8
ES: -30 > -55
KS: 60 > 80
MS: 40 > -25
CS: 0 > 0
so go post away btw, Sorry for the huge delay, i know alot of you must have thought we`ve forgotten about these updates....but nope, we haven`t, we just love keeping you in suspense til the point of you not caring any more
Love you all, Sincerely we the people of this thingy |
|
Ragnarok
99+ day(s) ago | Thanks. That cleared it up for me. |
Slavyzz
99+ day(s) ago | Certicom
6day(s) ago Why did the Energy and Missile shield get whacked so hard on both versions?
the question ^
Deiloche
3day(s) ago They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. It`s called "balance".
the answer ^
Hope that clears up your confusion ragnarok |
Ragnarok
99+ day(s) ago | I meant this part
"They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. "
Who is "they"? And what is "it`s" refering to? The schooner? Some history about the schooner that I`m not aware of from ages past? |
ArcticFox
99+ day(s) ago | Agree the second one looks more nifty :P
Could I confirm that the 50% capture rate for the schooner still applies? |
Slavyzz
99+ day(s) ago | Huh. The second one. |
Maraudian
99+ day(s) ago | he means " balance " |
Ragnarok
99+ day(s) ago | what do you mean? |
Deiloche
99+ day(s) ago | They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. It`s called "balance". |
Ragnarok
99+ day(s) ago | hope the changes go through soon. It seems that the energy/missile option has overwhelming support. :) |
ear614
99+ day(s) ago | dont lisen to him certicom he just whats to show that he has power that no one else has in uc or gc |
Certicom
99+ day(s) ago | Maraudian: Wow, no need to be so jerky with your answer to me, did I personally slight you at some point and you hold a grudge or something? I sure do not remember that.
Would be nice to hear others thoughts. Hypothetically if I was just leaving it to those that can answer the question, then that would be why the question was being asked. However, I saw the nice increase in weapons so it is reasonable to reduce the shields and overall the collective seem to be a more offensive race so it is in line with that. |
TheEdge
99+ day(s) ago | yea i would like to know that too how can i get a updated ship list |
StarSeeker
99+ day(s) ago | 5 ships with missile attack. Can`t imagine the Guardians are going to like that too much. I vote for 2nd version too. Do we still PM Maraudian to get the updated ship lists? |
chessRPGrulerKoA
Game-Admin
99+ day(s) ago | I`m sure my opinion doesn`t matter here, but I like the second one. |
Maraudian
99+ day(s) ago | Certicom , if you cant answer that yourself then i would just leave it to people who can ^_^ |
Certicom
99+ day(s) ago | Why did the Energy and Missile shield get whacked so hard on both versions? |
archaeoptyrex
99+ day(s) ago | So no more complaints by colls about being defenseless against kinetic!
I think it`s a good ship but maybe the abs shield def is a tad high for a range 9 ship? ... maybe something like +65 or +70% might be more appropriate (with maybe -15 or -20 in missile def?) |
Maraudian
99+ day(s) ago | think ill add the EM one then after doing saome tests |
Darkshot
99+ day(s) ago | E/M ftw! |
ear614
99+ day(s) ago | E/M looks better |
