Requiem
2007-09-28 |  | New ships (terran) |  |
TERRAN
Name T.Imperatus
Class Battleship
Weapon 4000
Energy Damage 2500
Kinetic Damage 1500
Missile Damage 0
Chemical Damage 0
Hull 7500
Range 7
Scanner rating 0
Power rating 6335
Cost per unit 74,175
Upkeep 7200
1 turn produces 4
Mineral Required Mineral Required
Terran Metal 85
Red Crystal 0
White Crystal 0
Rutile 0
Composite 0
Strafez Organism 0
Ship Specials No defense
This ship can`t return fire if attacked.
No retaliation
Ships attacked by this ship cannot return fire.
Ship Attributes Defense Modifier
Energy Shield + 30 %
Absorption Shield - 25 %
ECM + 30 %
Ionized Hull + 25 %
I feel that the terrans need a much better battleship than the T.Empereur... so yeah dunno if this could do the job better... hardier and much more desirable me thinks, yet not at all overpowered. =)) |
|
Suicide
99+ day(s) ago | looks to me like gt.emperur copy |
AccordEX
99+ day(s) ago | Terrans do not need anymore good ships most of there p class own if used right and there heavy packers have a kick and you guys want the T. Emp changed to something better what nect lower the power rating per herc? |
Huaiyi
99+ day(s) ago | t.emp is ok but i agree i think the terrans could do with a better battleship as majority of the time the t.emp is really bad!!! |
ThEpAkIsTaNIeMpIrE
99+ day(s) ago | t.emp has positice chem to dont turn it negative and the kenetic is negative which is right |
Zenith
99+ day(s) ago | Oh wait, the thing has positive chem? Ha, better change it to -25%
Course, the argument that terrans are fine is a strong one. I personally think not, because its easier to stack as terran if you can use your destroyers, but the build rates are really slow... |
ThEpAkIsTaNIeMpIrE
99+ day(s) ago | emp is a nice ship u need to kno how to use it of course but if we replace will make terrans a bit more offensive i dont kno ask mara he will say no go tell stephen he might |
AdmiralofHangTuah
99+ day(s) ago | species382,
No!! i dont agree if this ship will replace with tyr, tyr is a best ship. but i would like suggest replace with T.Kalieum.
opss.. Requiem, can u change the name :p |
armenia4ever
99+ day(s) ago | oops, point taken EA. Should have read the whole thing.
The emp is fine as it is. We dont need to replace it with something better. Terran are possibly the best race in the game. Terran ships are just fine. Why make a change, when no change is needed? |
Hiigarans
99+ day(s) ago | i prefer my Emp design more than urs LOL
anyway, Maraudian wont agree on it. nothing more than `the most balance` tag for the Terran and somehow, read my thread on T.Kaliuem. go n read what Maraudian reply about the Terran update. |
DrunkenMasters
99+ day(s) ago | This is more or less aragonite. Change it a bit... |
Slavyzz
99+ day(s) ago | because if you fixed the Temp it would have to be renamed, thus its legacy of complete and total suckage could finally be forgotten |
Zenith
99+ day(s) ago | It`s like an empereur with no retal/no defense. And a bit nicer shields in my opinion. It looks ok...
I think this isn`t a bad idea. I mean, empereur is really, really bad. Even in low stacks it`s not that good cause it doesn`t have no retal. This is better... Almost flyschlike in fact...
The no defense kinda helps lower its power a bit. Maybe raise PR a bit? |
DrunkenMasters
99+ day(s) ago | Whatever it is, the name is irrelevant |
PandoraLives
99+ day(s) ago | then why not jsut fix the empereur and not rename it |
DrunkenMasters
99+ day(s) ago | AccordEX
3 hour(s) ago actually the T.Emp is a great ship if used correctly in the lower stacks when stacking, if ur spamming them then newbie off and die becuase then they suck.
I disagree, Emp is BS |
species382
99+ day(s) ago | hercs by crossfiring from lower stacks without getting in the danger to get em whiped by a dumb pyth spam.... |
Zanarkand
99+ day(s) ago | ^_^ i think Terrans deserves to get a new ship ^_^ though i am not too sure you want to put the upkeep so high *notes the already high upkeep, higher on the minerals would be more of an advantage =p
Though what ships is this suppose to kill ? |
AccordEX
99+ day(s) ago | actually the T.Emp is a great ship if used correctly in the lower stacks when stacking, if ur spamming them then newbie off and die becuase then they suck. |
species382
99+ day(s) ago | well i agree as replacement of the TYR its ok ;-))))
no seriously, looks fine, even so the mineral requirements are a little bit low (i know, its like the emp, but as compensation, the emp is complete bu**sh**). The only disadvantage i see is the no retail/no defence abilities. Well with both of em its completely fine, however, soon some people will try to argue the "no defence" away, and then the ship isnt balanced any more..... |
EvilAbadayos
99+ day(s) ago | if you read it properly armenia4ever you will see that it is offered as a REPLACEMENT to an existing ship, not in addition to.
Im not judging the OP however cos my views are well know to most |
