Forum Index › General Discussion › UW pro`s and cons

UW pro`s and cons

Started by Khamon · 17/10/2010 · 01:55 AM · 25 replies · 1 read

K KhamonOP

OP 17/10/2010 · 01:55 AM #1

I hate to repost this but I want to form a petition for this server. When this game started an uw was devastating but with the vet clusters and rich empires they bounce back to soon making rt very unbalanced. In addition to 90% loss of resources I purpose 10% loss in land and infrastructure. It seems harsh but think about this, another 5 years from now you`ll have empires maxed out in 3 days after an uw as opposed to 1-2 weeks.

I feel real strongly about this and think it will tighten the gap between rich and poor. And gordor`s as a commodity will be in higher demand and will move empires to learn the art of making artis.

V VALJA

17/10/2010 · 02:32 AM #6

Badwolf... with due respect... minerals and income are by right the by product of turns that actually mean nothing in the game nowadays... but when it comes to turns and time that players spent to gain infra`s levels and fuse arties... these 2 elements that actually what hold an empire on survival...

the big problem that SFGC is facing which everyone`s trying to ignore compared to other games, SFGC doesn`t have the option of "shortcut" for new players to blend in with older players... everytime this issue is to be brought up... the simple answer is, "go play UC"...

deny it all we want... forever SFGC is going nowhere...

D DrKsTGuArDiAnOP

17/10/2010 · 02:22 AM #5

Good point BW about coll and maru, instead like you said a stiff % loss in arti stores and a bigger drop in infra. Once this is done I think the other half of helping this game is starting new players off with something to look forward to like a one week paid account free with an arti starter kit with 5 of you basic artis to start with.

V VALJA

17/10/2010 · 02:14 AM #4

sorry Khamon... i play SFGC to build a long lasting empire... i`ve played more than 6 yrs and i`ve maxed all my infras... i never like UW since day one... so do you think i`ll agree to this?

anyway... IF the new players think this should be done, the truth is... i don`t give a freaking care anymore... perhap it`s time... i don`t see Stephen`s doing anything... and i don`t see why i should be a paid member anymore next year...

so go ahead... make it happens...

BadWolf

17/10/2010 · 02:12 AM #3

there already are empires who can max cash in 3 days however...

i disagree with land decrease when you come to races such as collective or marauder that`s just not fair each UW you lose 10% of your land you either have to replace or live with...

-90% of all artifacts would be much more devastating and may balance things out between all the old arti hoarders across all servers but yeah it would require stephen

M MajorDinero

17/10/2010 · 02:00 AM #2

I agree completely, but I say no to decreasing land, but I think that all infrastructure should be gone. Yes ALL of it.

either that or, UWs should wipe out 90% of all artifacts too.

Not sure if stephen would be needed for this change. Something tells me that he would be...

Page 2 of 2

Reply

⚠

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.