I have nothing against Slavers...though i also have nothing against those who have se* with a corpse. Just because I think they are lowlier than scum on a stagnant pond doesn`t mean i`m biased or anything...
But...given Slavers take money when someone makes a few shekels...shouldn`t it also be they have to ay money to subsidize losses when the income is negative?
F
FlashysDomainOP