GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion A.Miner Starbase Discussion

A.Miner Starbase Discussion

Started by BadWolf · 22/08/2010 · 05:52 AM · 394 replies · 8 reads
BadWolfOP
Ok people it`s time to vote on these idea`s if you would pls submit all your votes to the empire PollMeister on RT. this will decide which or all of these shall go through. just copy paste the format below with your choices


1) Lakko Version one, with BR of either 4 or 3.
Lakko version two
or Lakko the Redesigned Concept.

2) kyro upkeep reduction (y/n)

3) Livid upkeep reduction (y/n)

4) lyth upkeep reduction (y/n)

5 Chlor build rate reduction and Epidote build rate increase (y/n)


in a format similar to this pls
1) lakko version two
2)Yes
3)No
4)No
5)No

*note the changes to hoko will go through, and Chlor and epidote is a package deal, you can`t get either or.

also only one vote per person, not account, if we find you voted with multiple accounts all your votes will be discounted for wasting our time. Also for those of you that have taken the Lakko as part of a UW Reward, you will have the option to choose another ship.
------------------

These are the current changes proposed by the staff, please discuss them in a constructive manner, feel free to also pm feed back directly to us.

Lakko version one

upkeep is increased from 2,352 to 7,195

Build rate, dropped from 5 to 4 or 3
which means instead of 55,350 pr a turn it`s now 44,280 or 33,210 pr a turn

or

M.Lakko redesign concept
Energy Damage 11,500
Missile Damage 24,000
Hull 55,000
Range 3
Scanner rating 623
Power rating 36,666
1 turn produces 1
Ship upkeep 32,999

Ship Specials
No retaliation
Ships attacked by this ship cannot return fire.

Energy Shield +40%
Absorption Shield -60%
ECM +40%
Ionized Hull -95%

Or..

M.Lakko Ver. 2
4,000 Total Damage
1,500 Energy Damage
1,500 Kinetic Damage
1,000 Missile Damage
Hull 15,000
Scanner 900
Range 8
Power Rating 11,061
1 turn produces 5
Ship upkeep 6,032

Ship Specials
No defense
This ship can`t return fire if attacked.

Energy Shield +30%
Absorption Shield +30% Was +15%
ECM -40% Was -30%
Ionized Hull +40%

Hoko

upkeep increased from 1,450 to 4,475

build rate dropped from 6 to 5
which means instead of 59,670 pr a turn it`s now 49,725 pr a turn

Kyro

upkeep reduced from 45,000 to 32,328

Lyth

upkeep reduced from 52,052 to 41,154

Livid (r)

upkeep reduced from 20,000 to 15,641

Chlor

build rate dropped from 10 to 8

Epidote

build rate increased from 10 to 12

Edited by ShatterdDreams on 2010-08-28

Edited by BadWolf on 2010-08-29

Edited by BadWolf on 2010-08-29

Edited by BadWolf on 2010-08-29

Edited by ShatterdDreams on 2010-08-29
F Fuzzy
I think this would probably balance things most overall:

1)Lakko the Redesigned Concept
2)Yes
3)Yes
4)No
5)Yes
L L337Phoenix
1) Lakko the Redesigned Concept
2) Yes
3) Yes
4) Yes
5) No
S Slavyzz
If I were going to vote I`d say

1. Version 2
2. yes
3.yes
4. yes
5. YES

But I`m not gunna vote! :P
D DrLatBC
"
build rate increased from 10 to 12

Edited by Shat" o-0 lol
S ShatterdDreams
just because a person is known for playing a certain race it doesn`t mean they don`t play miner on another server. and i of course trust everyone here to make honest decsions, and again....If you want your vote to count pm your vote to the empire, PollMeister on RT. if you post just on this thread it will be ignored!
D DrLatBC
Lakko version one with br of 4

y
y
n
y

5 should be 2 different ones >.> chlor needs to stay the same and epi needs to go up tbh lol
D Deiloche
lakko version 2
n
y
y
n
S Sibiriangun
lol @ Sam :P

Im pretty sure Labrat knows a great deal more about balancing issues in GC than many others in here, so you might want to stop throwing lame accusations around. Just because you dont play a miner doesnt mean you cant have a non-biased oppinion about the ships.
S SamTheMan
Ya after seeing Labrat, a long term Terran post no across the board, is so selfish.
However AGM94 was a fair voter.
N NiHiLiM
was thinking the same fouders :s

those who target the miners obviously vote the options that are least beneficial for miners. <_<

99% of people vote selfish.
like they`d care if the game is balanced or not.
if they can win something, at cost of others, they will...

that`s why votes don`t work.
Enlightened absolutism overrules democracy imho.
F FOUNDERS
i hope this does not come down to most votes as there are many none aminers who will try to harm us. we are already a defensive race.
F FOUNDERS
1)version2
2)y
3)y
4)y
5)n
S ShatterdDreams
i don`t mind if you post your votes on this thread that`s fine if you want to share, just note your votes won`t be counted unless you pm it to the proper empire as instructed above
G GradualIncline
Notice that there`s no option for the Hoko :P
A abcstop
1)Lakko the Redesigned Concept.
2)n
3)n
4)n
5 n
A AGM94
1)Lakko the Redesigned Concept.

2)y

3) y

4) n

5 y
H Hiddendragon
Vote:
1 Lakko Ver. 2
2 y
3 y
4 y
5 n
Page 6 of 20

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.