GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion it happen again

it happen again

Started by backoff · 25/06/2010 · 09:14 AM · 57 replies · 2 reads
B backoffOP
Empire ID 344976
Empire Name EnderWiggin
Protection Damage Protection
Expires in 503 hours
Race A.Miner
Planets 1
Rank 1
Power Rating 561,337,777
Federation The Destroyers
More info
Slave Empire of N/A

nothing to say...1st is kraven, now tis joker, who is the next one?

*just my personal thought, if u wan to go for uw, fight like a MAN, dun vm, then build, then vm.......i still remember b4 my uw, when my stack nearly complete, blazed hit me n my pr dropped by 20%, but still, i build back up to 1B pr.....at least, i feel like, i din abuse the usage of vm.
S Seventeen
I never see why it pisses people off when people go on vacation at a high power rating. If you are that arsed about the bonus ...build higher than him....?

I think ned`s got it right. It isnt helping him, all it means is that there will be a few people ready to take him down when it runs out.

be cool lol...
T Travvivian
*Travv giggles maniacally as he re-enters VM*
B BloodRavens
to add we had many uw`s s a miner for instance take my epic fighter spam UW:) i never vmed once and went near max pr and you ned was not far behind.. its just means he is poor and won`t be able to rebuild:):):)
H HoneyBucket{HH}
I don`t think anyone claimed he was VM building, just in VM high up in the ranks. And yes he will come down eventually either way, but we`d rather not have to wait for so long to take him down. Plus there is a chance that his friends will retake the ranks close to his vm expiration, just like kraven did a few times, and get the chance to build up further.
N nedflanders
I agree that VMing building sucks...especially on RT where it`s harder to define this. Still, the fact that he hit VM for 503 hours seems to indicate at least there is no intent of VMing building
N nedflanders
well, unless he VM builds, he`s only going to go down. It`s tough to recover and start building again when:

a) the ranks aren`t yours
b) in your absence all the rich ppl have had the chance to make money to climb to 2x your PR twice while you`ve made no money at all.
c) you just announced to your enemies that you are building a UW fleet by VMing.

unless he wants to VM forever he`s probably going to come down in flames.

If anything, the top 5 works against the VMer sometimes. With one less spot in the top 5, without fedwar...you can`t hit ppl from -300 and people only VM when they lose the ranks anyways. So whoever`s in the 6th slot won`t get scouted/killed as easily.
H HoneyBucket{HH}
Ned at times it does benefit them... for one because it takes one spot out of the top 5 advantage per player that vm`s in the top 5, which helps anyone going against us for the most part... secondly because it stops us from destroying their fleet until their friends take back the ranks and they can either build more or start a uw.

And the main thing this time, like i said, is that it was a very disappointing thing to see after we worked so hard and didn`t get to take a shot at his huge fleet.
N nedflanders
so much drama, I fail to see when VMing in the top 5 has ever benefited anyone doing the VMing, lmao. especially on RT when 7 days of turns = billions and trillions of cash for the players who don`t VM and play actively. Hilarious, you guys should be thanking anyone that VMs top 5.

Yes yes, CC does a great job on RT with ranks...but ya`ll really get freaked out over nothing sometimes lol. Makes me wonder :O
H HoneyBucket{HH}
Alright a few of you just need to relax.

Sibi is a very good player and very active... him taking vm is actually a relief as far as I am concerned, though I enjoy fighting him I could us a break from him right about now.

As for Enders vm i consider it a low blow and a bit of a bs move. It is very disappointing when you fight for days to take back the ranks and spend tons of time and resources to take an opponent down and then he hits the big vm button just before you get to him. If he was building up for a UW and didn`t have time he should have let us take him down. My mates have every right to be frustrated after the effort put forth, this was a very disappointing end to a very intense battle.

Seifer, If you`re going to do something just to piss off a fellow player, then you are scum of the earth as far as I am concerned. People like you are the reason why there is so much misery on this planet. Let`s not all just go around doing something simply because it pisses off others, no matter how much that person irritates you, or no matter how much you dislike them. Rise above the situation.

MK and gang, thank you for the last few days of fighting, it was a blast, almost as good as a UW, other than the ending. We appreciate you and your efforts as a foe. Well done by you all, well organized, I am impressed.
S Seifer
Is there any penalty for using words such as "dun", "tis" and "din"?
B BloodRavens
Anyways back to the point!! hats off to MK you gave us a lilttle fun this week and we all needed it i hope we all as active next week:) I just love playing cold war with you guys xd GF
B BloodRavens
Seifer go loose more clusters mate!
K Kraven
try to be more sensitive you jerk!
K Kraven
it`s all relative trav. If your super pathetic and really have nothing other than SF to worry about it is huge deal when some lazy tb player irritates you.
T Travvivian
Chill the heII out; Verb. Def: Something some of you guys seriously need to do.
B backoffOP
Seifer
4hour(s) ago Thread creator option: This is the answer
If wan talk, talk english plz, not singlish, chinglish, or watever the fuk u talking

**admin, is there any penalty for using a `fuk` here???

dude, be gentle~
S Seifer
Aww poor BloodRavens. Want a cookie?

Since it pisses you off so much ill try to VM in top 5 this weekend
Page 2 of 3

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.