GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion Updates and Changes

Updates and Changes

Started by BrokenSwordS · 08/09/2009 · 02:35 AM · 485 replies · 24 reads
BrokenSwordSOP
Over the next few hours the following changes will take place.


  • Lyth
    Upkeep will be restored to 52,052 from 41,154

  • Lakko will be tweaked:-

    M.Lakko
    Energy Damage 11,500 => 7,700
    Missile Damage 24,000 => 16,000
    Hull 55,000 => 36,500
    Range 3
    Scanner rating 623 => 416
    Power rating 36,666 => 24,444
    1 turn produces 1 => 2
    Ship upkeep 32,999 => 20,666


    Ship Specials
    No retaliation
    Ships attacked by this ship cannot return fire.

    Energy Shield +40%
    Absorption Shield -60%
    ECM +40%
    Ionized Hull -95%

  • G.Sapphire
    Buildrate will be changed from 1 => 2

  • G & D class

    Marauders D class & Miners G class will be put back into there own shiplists (I.E Miner`s G class is currently under guardian to prevent capture.. While Marauders D class is under Dark Marauder to prevent capture


I have found a possible fix that in my testing appears to work well to disable capture within captureable shiplists..

Long story short this Should change nothing other then providing proper listing for these ships..

However if you do happen to capture any D/G class you are to inform Me personally via PM immediately with details as for How it happened if you are able to..

And if you are a viral and happen to capture/reverse any G/D class ships your entire shiplist will be ERASED



Edited by BadWolf on 2011-01-07
U UberPansy
So the bases were added for flavor? Fail. Game balance is the primary consideration.
D DrunkenMasters
On a side note, bases in UWs are super easy to kill if you have a few BTCs, 10 BTCs tops and a quartz spam and you can kill 100 mil lakko easily...
D DrunkenMasters
Chiron is way better than miner bases. Honestly. The only downfall is the lower range. But it can capture.

Change pyth upkeep for virals? I don`t think that is possible, ned. At least Stephen won`t do it. If it was possible, pyth/angel upkeep would have been different for virals than marauders already. And I think if the upkeep is 1:2 for marauders, that will be VERY expensive for a normal marauder(I am not talking about agri marauders with several big c3s).

But yeah, miner bases need higher upkeep. But considering all races have their UNIQUE ships that are VERY GOOD, and bases are just that for miner, the upkeep shouldn`t go up way too much. Hell, terran has herc thor and zeus, viral has cronus borr and chiron, why not miner have 2 strong ships that can`t attack anyway?!?(Still, double the upkeep imo, that will be much better...). I don`t think you guys arguing here were around or did comment on the original miner thread where it was explained why miner got those bases - it is supposed to be the best defensive race and that was the single reason miner got the bases as far as I remember.
N nedflanders
`so that a miners can uw without skill` that`s perhaps too strong of a hyperbole?
N nedflanders
guys, before we get all caught up in flamming miners...keep in mind that the starbases are defensive. You can`t use them to attack others, which really results in a huge tactical weakness just waiting to be exploited. Trust me....i`ve dealt with ppl who SB a lot before.

Anyways, if we are thinking of changing SB upkeep, then i propose the following:

change pyth upkeep for virals (to something like 50% upkeep:PR ratio)

reason: if miner cant have super cheap bases, then virals don`t need to be able to pyth spam to take those bases down. Hence, nerf the upkeep and encourage more stacking.

make livids a little cheaper (something like 90% upkeep: PR ratio)

reason: i consider herc/livid mirror ships. if you look at the herc...the upkeep is like less than 1:1 ratio. But the livid is insanely expensive. Make it cheaper and perhaps it will encourage stacking

OR

make lictor`s kinetic shd better. Switch the energy shds to kinetic shds. That way, miners will actually have a ship to counter gall, or other really nice kin boats.
U UberPansy
I`m glad to see some strong arguments for increased upkeep.

Capital ships are the only option against tremendously high build rate starbases. Building a humongous mass of capital ships is outrageously expensive and only possible for empires with a strong income base.

I think it was a mistake to introduce a ship for such a particular role as `so that a miners can uw without skill` and then expect that it will somehow be balanced for overall play. When a ship has only one way it can be assaulted I think that strategic gameplay suffers.
S Sibiriangun
I agree with PP.

Miner bases need an upkeep increase. They are among the best SBs awailable and it makes no sense their upkeep has to be that low compared to the miner income. As we have seen recently a maru UW has gone off on fast mainly consisting of lakkos.... why should marus be able to afford a miner ship???

Just increasy the upkeep a fair bit, that would balance the miner bases much more.
S Sibiriangun
I agree with PP.

Miner bases need an upkeep increase. They are among the best SBs awailable and it makes no sense their upkeep has to be that low compared to the miner income. As we have seen recently a maru UW has gone off on fast mainly consisting of lakkos.... why should marus be able to afford a miner ship???

Just increasy the upkeep a fair bit, that would balance the miner bases much more.
D DrunkenMasters
Yeah SBs are rigged only in UW situations really, but they are not tremendously overpowered - at equal pr they get owned by basicly every cap ship in the game...
M MajorDinero
and they should deserve to be able to climb high, just like how virals can climb high with pyth (less economy than miner..but pyth is an offensive ship)

hence, my focus on stats...I`m not denying that the miner SBs are overpowered, but I`d like to point out that they are really only overpowered in UW situations, since in normal combat...bases are easily dealt with. (trust me, I have had a lot of experience dealing with SB spammers :P)
P PistolPete
Well.. the fact remains that miners got the strongest economy of all races. Their bases cost 15% and 21% upkeep/PR... This is close to guardian upkeep and in the same order as marauder upkeep... I cant find any good argument why this makes sense. Afterall the Miner bases are among the best bases in game - i mean range 10 and 3 types of dmg!!!
M MajorDinero
yeah, but terrans get the herc...miners don`t have an anti kin boat and I think it needs to stay that way. One race isnt gonna have a definate counter to each and every other race.

btw, herc is a pretty decent ship to use against SBs. So, you arent too hopelessly outmatched by miner bases....

The real issue is miner bases in UWs....and I feel that this would be best addressed by modifying ship stats..not ship upkeep
U UberPansy
One race having a counter ship is not sufficient.
N nedflanders
I`ll just post my thoughts here:

considering that virals can build pyth really cheaply, I don`t think the upkeep is a huge issue on the miner bases (pyth is a really effective ship against bases)

So i feel that this balances it out...however, for UW situations, bases are slightly more powerful. Perhaps the attack could be nerfed slightly or something to help balance things out a little bit, but the upkeep is fine - as long as there is a counter to a basing miner (pything viral), then I feel the game is balanced.
U UberPansy
Yea agree with Think, I looked at that thread you linked to and the changes address some of the very things I`ve felt are imbalanced about miners! Good on you for pointing that out, especially since some of the changes would negatively impact your miner empire a bit. ;)
T Think
Good to point that out, PP.
P PistolPete
Not much happening with these miner updates:

http://gc.gamestotal.com/hef.cfm?&2337&f=hef_detail&hi=8371&ch=100
A Akoni
i would like it if maybe us guads was given a increase in how much we get from pop tax or even give us a battleship since we stop at crusier
B Bartos
well strengthening the other races and leaving guards untouched is weakening them also ;)
S Squaks
well BW if the plan is to nerf guards br to suit tb then i`d suggest to adjust income to suit tb also, only seems fair
Page 14 of 25

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.