We, the people of your staff....have created two versions of the Schooner, one is a traditional energy kinetic version, the other is a energy missile version.
both are posted here for you to review, test and comment on. The reason for posting two concepts it to allow you, the player the chance to vote on which prototype you`d rather see become the incarnation of the new schooner. The one that gets the most positive feed back and general overall approval will likely be the new schooner of choice
Remember you don`t have to vote for either one, you always have the option of keeping the current
Changes courtesy of: EphemeralEternity, BrokenSwordS, Deiloche, Raistlin, God and a few other individuals.
R.Schooner
E: 300 > 850
K: 300 > 200
Hull: 3,000 > 2,500
R: 9 > 9
Scanner: 100 > 220
Upkeep: 454 > 502
PR: 2,036 > 2,256
BR:12 > 8
ES: -30 > -50
KS: 60 > 70
MS: 40 >0
CS: 0 > -10
R.Schooner
E: 300 >900
K: 300 > 0
M: 0 > 250
Hull: 3,000 > 2,500
R: 9 > 9
Scanner: 100 > 170
Upkeep: 454 > 476
PR: 2,036 > 2,136
BR:12 > 8
ES: -30 > -55
KS: 60 > 80
MS: 40 > -25
CS: 0 > 0
so go post away btw, Sorry for the huge delay, i know alot of you must have thought we`ve forgotten about these updates....but nope, we haven`t, we just love keeping you in suspense til the point of you not caring any more
Love you all, Sincerely we the people of this thingy
Updates, Herr Schooner
Started by EphemeralEternity
· 13/08/2009 · 01:29 PM
· 28 replies
· 2 reads
R
Ragnarok
Thanks. That cleared it up for me.
S
Slavyzz
Certicom
6day(s) ago Why did the Energy and Missile shield get whacked so hard on both versions?
the question ^
Deiloche
3day(s) ago They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. It`s called "balance".
the answer ^
Hope that clears up your confusion ragnarok
6day(s) ago Why did the Energy and Missile shield get whacked so hard on both versions?
the question ^
Deiloche
3day(s) ago They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. It`s called "balance".
the answer ^
Hope that clears up your confusion ragnarok
R
Ragnarok
I meant this part
"They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. "
Who is "they"? And what is "it`s" refering to? The schooner? Some history about the schooner that I`m not aware of from ages past?
"They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. "
Who is "they"? And what is "it`s" refering to? The schooner? Some history about the schooner that I`m not aware of from ages past?
Agree the second one looks more nifty :P
Could I confirm that the 50% capture rate for the schooner still applies?
Could I confirm that the 50% capture rate for the schooner still applies?
S
Slavyzz
Huh. The second one.
he means " balance "
R
Ragnarok
what do you mean?
D
Deiloche
They got wacked because it`s offensive firepower received an extremely high boost. It`s called "balance".
R
Ragnarok
hope the changes go through soon. It seems that the energy/missile option has overwhelming support. :)
E
ear614
dont lisen to him certicom he just whats to show that he has power that no one else has in uc or gc
C
Certicom
Maraudian: Wow, no need to be so jerky with your answer to me, did I personally slight you at some point and you hold a grudge or something? I sure do not remember that.
Would be nice to hear others thoughts. Hypothetically if I was just leaving it to those that can answer the question, then that would be why the question was being asked. However, I saw the nice increase in weapons so it is reasonable to reduce the shields and overall the collective seem to be a more offensive race so it is in line with that.
Would be nice to hear others thoughts. Hypothetically if I was just leaving it to those that can answer the question, then that would be why the question was being asked. However, I saw the nice increase in weapons so it is reasonable to reduce the shields and overall the collective seem to be a more offensive race so it is in line with that.
T
TheEdge
yea i would like to know that too how can i get a updated ship list
5 ships with missile attack. Can`t imagine the Guardians are going to like that too much. I vote for 2nd version too. Do we still PM Maraudian to get the updated ship lists?
I`m sure my opinion doesn`t matter here, but I like the second one.
Certicom , if you cant answer that yourself then i would just leave it to people who can ^_^
C
Certicom
Why did the Energy and Missile shield get whacked so hard on both versions?
So no more complaints by colls about being defenseless against kinetic!
I think it`s a good ship but maybe the abs shield def is a tad high for a range 9 ship? ... maybe something like +65 or +70% might be more appropriate (with maybe -15 or -20 in missile def?)
I think it`s a good ship but maybe the abs shield def is a tad high for a range 9 ship? ... maybe something like +65 or +70% might be more appropriate (with maybe -15 or -20 in missile def?)
think ill add the EM one then after doing saome tests
D
Darkshot
E/M ftw!
E
ear614
E/M looks better
Page 1 of 2
Reply
⚠
You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.