Constructive criticism ONLY. If you don`t like something, say why. If you do like something, also say why. Useless posts are unacceptable.
Changes courtesy of: EphemeralEternity, BrokenSwordS, Deiloche
G.Lictor
ES: 80 > 40
KS: 40 > 80
Concept behind this change is to give A.Miners a strong anti kinetic ship, which is something severely lacking in the race. It still a big meat shield, but at least it will be able to soak up damage from some of the more powerful kinetic ships.
Lyth
Upkeep: 170% > 135%
OR
Upkeep: 170% > 120%
PR: 30kish > 50kish
BR: 2 > 1
OR
Upkeep: 170% > 120%
PR: 30kish > 25kish
120% puts the lyth in similar range with nirvana, tyr, aragonite, and the chlor for those familiar with fighting with those ships. But at 120% that is too low of an upkeep for a 60k BR. So the idea would be to lower it to a 50k BR, either by changing the BR to 1 and making the ship bigger, or making the ship smaller. Stats would maintain themselves relative to PR, so ratios would not change but actual values would.
G.Livid (r)
Upkeep: 160% > 120%
A good niche ship, the livid is massively underused largely due to it`s excessive upkeep.
A.Hoko
Upkeep: 14.6% > 35%
The A.Hoko is not a huge powerhouse except in UWs, but even in regular usage the upkeep on this ship is far too low, especially for a race as wealthy as A.Miners.
M.Lakko
Upkeep: 21.2% > 40%
The M.Lakko is a pretty good defensive ship and as it`s better than the Hoko it needs more upkeep. However, in maintaining with the standards of the defensive A.Miner race, this ship will maintain a low upkeep.
A.Kryo
Upkeep: 60% > 30%
The kryo is the weakest miner SB and costs way too much. Hence... upkeep reduction ftw.
Edited by BrokenSwordS on 2009-07-15
D
DeilocheOP