GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion Guardian

Guardian

Started by Deiloche · 09/02/2009 · 08:15 AM · 487 replies · 6 reads
D DeilocheOP
Note: There are more to come. Tip of the iceberg.

Changes made:

Hun-Xe pr lowered to 71k stats kept the same
G.Corundum no defense removed..
L.Emerald swiched over to be L.Topaz
New L.Emerald put in
feedback needed

Edited by 420BadWolf on 2009-05-13
D Deiloche
Given that a fez spam dies to pretty much any stack with ease... that would certainly be an improvement over what guards usually get spammed with.
G guardians
i am currious (sorry my spelling sucks) what is about the possibility of having a high range ship in the guard ship lists at all
M Maraudian
it really slows things down and annoys me to see so many posts that dont help in the slightest or have any thought in
G guardians
what about making one of the guard ships into a battleship class type ship
M Maraudian
me 2 ^^ , begone with viral scum xD
K KnightOfBaa
i think u shud just put the game back to ver 1.03 or what ever it was again :P
M Maraudian
the updating is testing , i refuse to use dm server ever because of yall.

so here`s one more of those comebacks
S Squaks
yes these new missile mods on topaz and emmy will make it nicer now to stack and not get beat by missiles as much so they shouls be pretty nice on def, but spamming them we will just have to wait and see if they stack up against the other common spammed ships
T Tsunami
after all these "sheilds modifications" i feel i might get spammed with fez more then missle, or a wacko combination
I Ishamael
squaks.. something about missile ships beating guardian ships. I feel like the +80% mods on missile just MIGHT turn those tables. But I just skimmed over your post so maybe I read it wrong. ah well.
T Tsunami
seeing as were no longer testing b4 updating.... when can these be implemented
M Maraudian
ofc they are meant to blunty put a stop to UW`s but anyhow ...
M Maraudian
guardian spams tend to be faster than most even if less efficient , usually used to pester people , such as UW`s etc
S Squaks
spamming as guard is not always a great idea and generally it fails compared to other races spams so i`m not sure where everyone is thinking that guard spamming will be super powerful when all you need to do is outrange us with missiles and hit on agressive lol, thats also why the emmy should get 9 range so in out stacks we can hit them first for once
C collective1
Since when does the ability to stack stop spamming? relatively cheap spammable ship building at 55k/turn is rather unbalanced imo...still feel an adjustment needs to be made
I Ishamael
That Topaz is realllly bad. hahaha
I IambadPlc
Collective: It seems fair. I look at the weapon/pr ratio and they are not that awesome as the stats look for it. *shrug* It looks like suicide to use them at real low powers.
D DrunkenMasters
Corun will be just fine without no def. Doubt it will be spammed too much with the current stacking ability of guards.
C collective1
if the corun`s `no defense` is removed then it MUST be accompanied with a hull nerf (or perhaps a massive increase in upkeep) or else it will spammed all the time

regarding emmy/topaz, more important than PR per turn is damage per turn...other than the current emmy/topaz, the top 8+ range is currently queen at 14k per turn whereas the top 9+ range is thor at 12.8k per turn ... current plans are well over double for both...is that fair?
420BadWolf
also as Knossos here pointed out emerald was 9 range to begin with at a much higher pr.. well i imagine in your terms it must have been massively unbalanced?
Page 5 of 25

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.