GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion Guardian

Guardian

Started by Deiloche · 09/02/2009 · 08:15 AM · 487 replies · 4 reads
D DeilocheOP
Note: There are more to come. Tip of the iceberg.

Changes made:

Hun-Xe pr lowered to 71k stats kept the same
G.Corundum no defense removed..
L.Emerald swiched over to be L.Topaz
New L.Emerald put in
feedback needed

Edited by 420BadWolf on 2009-05-13
S Sephiroth
SHIPS - L.Emerald


Name L.Emerald
Class Destroyer
Weapon 30,000
Energy Damage 0
Kinetic Damage 0
Missile Damage 30,000
Chemical Damage 0
Hull 20,000
Range 9
Scanner rating 3,400
Power rating 42,236

Unit(s) in fleet 0
Credits available 7,756
Cost per unit 652,698
Upkeep 4,536

1 turn produces 1
Turns available 9

Purchase unit(s)
Total Cost


Mineral Required Mineral Store Required
Terran Metal 6 35
Red Crystal 0 80
White Crystal 0 80
Rutile 0 130
Composite 0 0
Strafez Organism 0 0


Ship Specials No defense
This ship can`t return fire if attacked.


No retaliation
Ships attacked by this ship cannot return fire.


Ship Attributes Defense Modifier
Energy Shield - 40 %
Absorption Shield + 10 %
ECM + 80 %
Ionized Hull - 60 %
S Squaks
i`m not sure why everyone wants to take away range from the only guard ships that have it, also the new updated ships look pretty nice now i need to start testing them on people
D DrunkenMasters
Give scouts 100000 damage, then guard will be balanced.
Arsenal SUCK!
D DrunkenMasters
BIG GUNS >> SMALL GUNS. Give us more suicidal ships!
B Brillodien
G.Corundum no defense removed <--- good

Hun-Xe pr lowered to 71k <--better /// stats kept the same <--mixed feelings, i would say increase chemical attack and cut hull a little, or just up it`s hull some and add no retal

L.Emerald switched over to be L.Topaz <--just really changed name but ok lol

New L.Emerald put in <--- i like the idea of having 9 range and reducing its hull dramatically to compensate, i suppose it all good but you could consider upping energy or absorption shield a tad but leaving it weak to chemical

all in all not bad work guys
S Sephiroth
gaaraofsand agreed every1 who is some other race says that these ships are over powered or have too much build rate but we are the poorest race which should be copensated for that not making god ships for us but ships that are better than what some biased virals and such want us to have so far i like the new updates and i just switched back to guard.......
G gaaraofsand
over powered lol, we got a -85% racial modifier for housing if thats whats called "over powered" then something wrong here haha, whats wrong with giving a poor race good ships. good jobs im liking the updated ships. way to go guys
S Sephiroth
well.... after i can at least look at the emmy after i research it ill comment though i do like that u guys moved emmy`s stats to topaz and made emmy into something different nice move XD
C collective1
what`s happening, could someone clarify if this is the new topaz or emmy and what the other one is?

all guards and guard-hitters please give feedback, we need to make sure guards aren`t too overpowered overall by the end...
G guardians
i`d like to note to the guides/admin`s doing these updates. thank you very much they are looking great you guys are doing a great job
4 420BadWolf
lol as mara said but everyone please refer to the main post ^
M Maraudian
cor also had no defence removed
M Maraudian
will take a while for it to refresh manual wise but if you go to the build ship section the changes are in place

emerald and topaz got swapped around , then the topaz ( now emmy, was remade ) , the research etc was also fixed , sort of confusing untill server refresh , first time ive done it

x_x
M Moops
shiplist update in progress ( guardian )

and so it begins....
4 420BadWolf
that will be gotten too first it would be nice to sort out emerald/topaz/corr give it some time then go from there... when we all have time *the ones working on the ships* also i have two updated designs for emerald/topaz which im going to post up later *a better worked out design for both with me and deiloche*
also regarding an l class ship gaining a second weapon type this wont happen......
S Squaks
instead of the garnet how about working on the Xe, you`d figure after spending 25k turns to get a ship it would actually be good
A ArchAng3l
was actually hoping one of the L ship have 2weapon type.. maybe a little energy or kinetic... so i think it will be good for garnet to serve a different role with 2 weapon than the emmy and topaz..
M Maraudian
i dont see why at the moment , i actually like the garnet :/
A ArchAng3l
so will the garnet have changes?
Page 4 of 25

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.