GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion Guardian

Guardian

Started by Deiloche · 09/02/2009 · 08:15 AM · 487 replies · 16 reads
D DeilocheOP
Note: There are more to come. Tip of the iceberg.

Changes made:

Hun-Xe pr lowered to 71k stats kept the same
G.Corundum no defense removed..
L.Emerald swiched over to be L.Topaz
New L.Emerald put in
feedback needed

Edited by 420BadWolf on 2009-05-13
T TheWorldUnited
ever thought of just dropping the ruby build rate....

so yes it is some super op ship that beats every non kalzul ship on carefull except herc....
but u have to put in alot of turns to get a decent stack/spam of it.... ( this is as well as the new corm and new em
D Deiloche
Please learn to read. It will prevent very poor questions and keep the thread flowing. :P
B Biohazard
make a choise, green red or blue. >_<
T TheWorldUnited
no the green is what the ships currently are blue is the newest proposed changes and red is the older proposed changes

and yes corun is alot better now its a great gaurd defence ship.... it drops like a rock to tyr angel flych ara on attack but beats them all on defence...
B Biohazard
G.Corundum shields as is.
Defense Modifier
Energy Shield + 99 %
Absorption Shield - 40 %
ECM - 20 %
Ionized Hull - 20 %

G.Corundum weapons as is.
Weapon 18,000
Energy Damage 9,000
Kinetic Damage 9,000
Missile Damage 0
Chemical Damage 0


Changes are not on RT
C Crack
only those in blue..
B Biohazard
are these change implemented already????
K Knossos
By "these two ships" I mean corundum and emerald btw. :)
420BadWolf
it will Knossos its just a question of when mostly don`t wanna move too fast here lol
K Knossos
Wouldn`t mind seeing the hun.xe get a slight boost either for the turns required to simply unlock it.
K Knossos
Looks decent to me. It seems logical to have the guardian destroyers focused on a more offensive stance when compared to the rest of their ship list; however, I could see people spamming these two ships when attacking. It might make guards attack more aggressively though.
A Archaeoptyrex
no the corun is much stronger now.

especially on defense
B BlackAngel
I`m just wondering why you are reducing all the ships hulls by HALF. Isn`t that the point of the guardian race? They don`t deal so much damage, but they have high hull.

In my opinion the increased damage doesn`t make up for the lost hull. Especially with the shield modifiers making the ships easier to kill. Look at the Corun... You are dropping the hull in HALF and then dropping ALL the shield modifiers. This ship is now about 3 times easier to kill.

If these are the kind of changes being made to guardian ships, then I hope you are dropping the hulls on all the other ships aswell.
A Archaeoptyrex
The corun has nice damage ... but will it be the *only* ship with no defense *without* no retal? -- I think it will be a good ship!

The emmy (the hull looks slightly low, not too bad; maybe 30 or 33k?) is good ... good to have lower build rate on a higher range ship.
M Maraudian
if we make these improvements to G and L , and maybe improve hun xe , then that itself would be interesting

would guardian still feel the need to spam :-/
M Maraudian
i dont see no xe improvement :-o
M MastaKilla
I agree that it looks much better now. Corr with range 8 would make it impossible to take down, and also harder to defend against since tyr/lyth would be ineffective. It also favors aggressive attacks against with the improved damage and still larger range than most capital ships. Maybee -50& ECM and -70%I Hull.

Emmy also looks more balanced now.
D DrunkenMasters
Yah looks decent, a bit of an overkill of the corun ECM thou.
A Africa
I like this! Maybe the cor is a bit weak with the ecm as stated by the others, but a minor detail I think.
Page 17 of 25

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.