GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion A.Miner Ship List

A.Miner Ship List

Started by Eternus · 14/06/2007 · 08:57 AM · 72 replies · 3 reads
E EternusOP
The changes detailed earlier have for the most part been done along with a few minor adjustments the results speak for themselves. Any comments, problems things i`ve missed please detail here it was 2am by the time i`d finished so mistakes are liable
F fleak2
wait a second should`nt the miners be a defensive race?

m.epidotes?

i think they should increase hull

and increase damage for energy cos they use mining lasers to mine should have better energy damage.

they should even have jaggernauts that when they build will increase mining rate powerful energy damage good hull crab shield crab scanners.

can only increase mining rate of 1 planet for each jag built

but that is hard to program

just another crabpy idea =P
D DrunkenMasters
miners were bullied way too long, they deserve decent ships XD
D Deiloche
The only thing that changed is the shield... so you`ve been playing this game HOW long?
H Hiigarans
just found out that M.Epidote has better shield, higher dmg and less pr than T.Garuda but with 500 hull less. hmm...
G GreenYedi_KoA
Just applied the changes to battlesim database. Enjoy;)

GreenYedi
http://cb-clan.de/sf/battle.php
H Hiigarans
my 1st battle with Miner after the update... it is very fun, Miner spam Lictor after improved. so, ppl spam Lyth when it improved LOL

10:11 PM 14/06/07
xxx attacked you. Attack has failed !

Name Units Casualties Remaining
xxx`s fleet
M.Lyth Dreadnought 20 6 14
M.Flysch Battleship 52 24 28
G.Livid (r) Fighter 20 18 2
M.Chlorite Destroyer 200 47 153
Large Strafez Runner 500 500 0
M.Epidote Destroyer 200 200 0
Strafez Queen 200 200 0
Light fighter-drone Fighter 35,000 35,000 0
A.Aragonite Dreadnought 32 4 28
M.Calcite Cruiser 50 0 50

also, after i test in simulation, M.Cholrite suspose die more (note simulation was the old version, M class missile do have no defense). well, it lose only 47 units which was out of my expect :(
G GCLOanShArK
How sad. my post disapeared... Think i shouldnt be here at the first place.. : P
Well, this should be nothing to do with a friendly businessman again..
So please, dont attack me next time ya.. : ) will go for low pr again soon lol
D Deiloche
Only thing you would change about the illite is increasing it`s buildrate a bit.
A Angst
Change M.Illite and then we`re talkin :D
A Angst
Meh, still don`t really use those ships postupdate status. Well okay epidote. GOod for counters I guess?? Lictor is retty sweet now toooooo. Lyth is still awkward to me.
D DrunkenMasters
I think terran frigates` build rates should be increased like 50%, new emp, garuda +4 build rate and that will be just fine for terrans.
V {Veil}
i do really like the changes, and much appreciate the work done by admins, but now all i can ask for, is possibly the fixing of emps, and maybe increase build rates on garus.. as with decent build rate they would be a much more worthwhile ship, and lastly, maybe a slight drop of upkeep on zues and and someone capital ships

just my two cents
E EternusOP
I talk its just Maraudian likes the sound of his own voice more, or rather the look of his own text, well i guess someone has to
*Eternus pats Maraudian
H Hiigarans
not clear with what gonna happen on the remoev no defence on M class missile units. we will see about it
M mrmanic
Thank you admins, boo to all the whinners! I think these are good changes, miners are stronger now but are not going to destory everyone. They will just get some respect when ppl attack them.
R Razgriz
eternus u need to talk more, ur like a ghost or something
A AGM94
the XXX in species stack is a terran that received reinforcements from an a,miner not a viral with 7 terran stacks
Page 1 of 4

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.