✦ GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index › General Discussion › RE-Contrust on T.Empereur

RE-Contrust on T.Empereur

Started by Hiigarans · 09/06/2007 · 03:48 AM · 49 replies · 2 reads
H HiigaransOP
OP 09/06/2007 · 03:48 AM
Name T.Empereur
Class Battleship
Weapon 3,500
Energy Damage 2,000
Kinetic Damage 1,500
Missile Damage 0
Chemical Damage 0
Hull 9,000
Range 7
Scanner rating 300
Power rating 6,556

Cost per unit 60,275
Upkeep 7,200

1 turn produces 6
(build rate might need to change if double build rate apply on other smaller ship later)

Mineral Required Required
Terran Metal 120

Ship Specials
No retaliation

Ship Attributes

Defense Modifier
Energy Shield - 30 %
Absorption Shield + 40 %
ECM - 20 %
Ionized Hull + 35 %

shiled was tuned. i post this up again to keep it tracked as i wont be free for next 3 weeks to do any shield test. show some respond.
T ThePakistaniEmpire
09/06/2007 · 12:03 PM
lol okay forget about chemical increase range to 8 and make 1000 missile damage because if this is added it will be like an m.flynce which people want increase producing which u did and i see by reducing the mineral cost to 100
V varna
09/06/2007 · 11:32 AM
Just give it to miners so they can have a good ship..they`ve been complaining too much =P
T Travvivian
09/06/2007 · 11:08 AM
Chemical damage for a Terran ship? That is rediculous. It wouldn`t fit with the race, at all.

Anyway, looks good to me.
T ThePakistaniEmpire
09/06/2007 · 05:08 AM
why it will own gaurds ship and if we put 500 in chemical u know it will be like a mini k ship kalzul mini ship lol
S SweetestDownfall
09/06/2007 · 05:01 AM
i dont think guardians will be too happy if you do this..loL!
T ThePakistaniEmpire
09/06/2007 · 04:56 AM
hmm actually hiligrans if u add 500 would t.emp be the greatest terran ship right cause it will be more like a viral ship
H HiigaransOP
09/06/2007 · 04:16 AM
Flysch? no idea on what u talking about. i dont see any part of the new Emp was same to Flysch beside the ship class LOL

if u r lose, u can search the previous thread to get some explaination on the new Emp shielding.
P pWn3dN3wb13
09/06/2007 · 04:15 AM
Cynthellion, your comment is out of the question. Two suggestions:
1) Completely get rid of Emp because the newbs spam it when they see the name "battleship" thinking it is actually good
2) Improve it.

There is no need to have useless ships in the game, we need DIFFERENT ships who are able to tune the stack and give it something more, unique .
C Cynthelion
09/06/2007 · 04:10 AM
Terrans have so many great ships that they don`t need Emps... they act as a nice Achilles heel to the Terran fleet.

I would suggest keeping everything as it is except changing the shields to:

+20% / -40% / +20% / 0%

Terrans don`t need a Flysch, we have Nirvanas.
Page 3 of 3

Reply

⚠
You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.