Forum Index › General Discussion › Propose update for Neutral

Propose update for Neutral

Started by Hiigarans · 27/03/2007 · 05:56 PM · 28 replies · 1 read

H HiigaransOP

OP 27/03/2007 · 05:56 PM #1

Objective:
simple, with a few new ships come in + improvement on other ships, Neutral units will need some small improvements to make it worth to use especially for F class when the new G class come in. this will encourage to stacking too. or else, the entire ships balance update will be meanningless :)

F class:
F.Spear +1 range, maybe for the F.Axe too. all F class upkeep reduce 5-10%.

C class:
all C class upkeep reduce 5-10%. credit cost reduce 5-10%. slightly increase build rate of Aries n Genimi

Strafez n Light class:
just keep what they are now.

G Gilead

28/03/2007 · 07:30 PM #9

update sounds good to me....

A AvianFlu

28/03/2007 · 08:15 AM #8

humm ye lower credit cost and stuff would be nice.

D DrunkenMasters

28/03/2007 · 05:37 AM #7

it will be good to have spear with range of 7, then I will use that ship a lot more...

K Kusari

27/03/2007 · 08:39 PM #6

Upkeep should stay the same, I like the Idea of improved build rate on some of the small ships like gemini and axe. The spear is mainly meant to be a defensive ship, perhaps instead of increased range, a slight hull increase instead?

Z Zenith

27/03/2007 · 07:46 PM #5

The increased build rates for aries and gemini sound good. Since they`re so terrible now.

Unless one is afraid of their massive hull:PR ratio? Their upkeep can stay the same, then lowered on taurus and cancer?

F fleak2

27/03/2007 · 07:43 PM #4

i would like to ask for the shield mod for the neutral ship that has 3 negative shield mod

it is abit...

would agree with the f and the straffez at any cost lower it`s upkeep for f class

H HiigaransOP

27/03/2007 · 05:58 PM #3

quaint
Game-Guide
26 day(s) ago new missile based neutral class would be horrible because there are way too many ships already and also no need for it,
- if a.miners get them they`ll probably be better than their current ships
- if terrans get them... *shrug* don`t want to think about that

there`s really no need for that lol :-)

for other suggestions I agree with the less upkeep costs

H HiigaransOP

27/03/2007 · 05:57 PM #2

BadSicilian
27 day(s) ago
hmm, he is correct, the new g class will eat most of the currnet neutral ships up, although they already do that from what i`ve seen from my uses of them, and c clas ha a high upkeep for a reason, leave it, missile neutral ship would be nice, except for the fact that it undermines the terran advantage of having p class...for guards having a missile ship with some actual uses, encourage actual stacking as well, for terrans it arouses all new difficulties...something of qhich maraudian pointed out to me when i brought the idea to his attention a few months ago.

f class range increase, yeah, would be useful....but wouldn`t make all that much difference really unless you were to hit aggressive, from wha ti`ve seen guards have the bigger use for them, they are our solution th the tyr problem...but on careful they are just that, a solution, not a good solution, give sword a reason to hit aggressive with, make spear worth using on careful...since sword is the aggressin ship, and spear is more for careful style stacks...just a thaught. :)

Slavyzz
28 day(s) ago
lol I think the neutral ships are great, the F sword is definitely a great ship though adding another range to the spear might convince me to actually build one. I haven`t built one literally for over a year.

DarckKnight
28 day(s) ago
c.gemini and c.aries build rate increased to make them a bit more usefull

Page 2 of 2

Reply

⚠

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.