L Class For Guardian

M MaraudianOP

OP 22/02/2007 · 06:48 AM #1

Same as before suggest away , no enflame arguing ect , then we will work it all out

Suggested PR`s

L garnet @ 35k pr
L Emerald @ 65k PR
L topaz @ 70k pr

L.Garnet

Scanner rating -600

Ship Attributes
Defense Modifier
Energy Shield - 20 %
Absorption Shield - 10 %
ECM + 50 %
Ionized Hull - 10 %

upkeep - 483

L. Emerald

Scanner rating - 1200

Ship Attributes
Defense Modifier
Energy Shield - 20 %
Absorption Shield - 10 %
ECM + 55 %
Ionized Hull - 20 %

upkeep - 453

L.Topaz

Missile Dmg + 2,000
Scanner rating -1000

Ship Attributes
Defense Modifier
Energy Shield - 20 %

Absorption Shield - 10 %
ECM + 60 %
Ionized Hull -30 %

upkeep - 425

Edited by Maraudian on 2007-03-01

B BadSicilian

22/02/2007 · 01:12 PM #27

i`m thinking the upkeep reduce was to actually make ppl use them instead of doing like i do and switch them for f and c classes :\

H Hiigarans

22/02/2007 · 01:10 PM #26

i got a suggestion on Ruby n Taurmaline as someone just mentioned in the thread.

slightly reduce the shield mod on enegry n missile. get -10% more on both, again when u stack wrongly, ur enegry ships will kick to G class, missile kick to L class. i dont think u will always lucky kick the right on Ruby n Taur on a 10 stacks fleet :)

H Hiigarans

22/02/2007 · 12:40 PM #25

i would said, no on range 8 for L.Garnet, it will be too useful which might take over the position of Emerald n Topaz on both offensive n defensive.

the range of L class should just stay away from any adjust :P

yet, the shield mod is good, i like it. prehaps the energy shield can slightly reduce more? this can push ppl to use energy dmg ships like C class, T class, M class. of course, it is a risk if kick wrong to G class, isn it a better combo? :D

upkeep reduce again? grr... i m jealous as a Terran and Miner player now. *poke Maraudian

D DreamlandReformed

22/02/2007 · 12:20 PM #24

*chants* 99missile, 99 missile, 99% missile, who cares about the other mods you can keep em as they are, and more hull more hull

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 10:11 AM #23

ruby and tourm dont need nerfing... nerf them and the entire race is instantly destroyed

* pictures the complaints flooding in from million + base pr empires trying to defend themselves with nuetral / special G and L class

F FieryGallacticos

22/02/2007 · 09:46 AM #22

LOL! ruby`s!!! and tourms.....but L class is better i dunno ....

Z Zenith

22/02/2007 · 09:40 AM #21

What about ruby and tourm? Are those getting nerfed?

L. class range should definitely be less than 9. Maybe 9 for the destroyer, but that`s it. No 10 range stuff.

The missile shield is a good touch. Definitely less scanners, useless otherwise.

S StormofBladeZ

22/02/2007 · 09:40 AM #20

this class still seems horrible. I never see guards use them and when i do i wipe them out.
it looks good for is misssle defence but a stack of thors on aggressive stilll killed them.

D DrKsTgUaRdIaN

22/02/2007 · 09:26 AM #19

full stacking guards get beat by full stacking skilled players by range, the defensive nature of L class is too scary to have front to mid stacks.

the range increase and scanner drop would be more usefull in defence.the only long range ships are broadsword,sword, and the sucky emerald

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 08:59 AM #18

heh L class dont need range improvement , their problem was that they didnt protect you from missile

for example P thor spam would kick L class all over the place... atleast now P thor spam will bounce to an extent , L and G class wont be great ships , they will simple be usefull ships for having in a stack :/

J jasoncndy

22/02/2007 · 08:59 AM #17

how can such powerful ships have such long range. They are way too much powerful

D DrKsTgUaRdIaN

22/02/2007 · 08:56 AM #16

L class is tricky to tackel, range is the biggest factor here,
topaz 10
emerald 9
garnet 8
just lower the scanner rating some, no multi damage either.ecm percentage should reflect the range as well
range 10=99%
range 9=90%
rang 8=80%

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 08:52 AM #15

yar i like that , ok starting from 60% it is

A Archaeoptyrex

22/02/2007 · 08:48 AM #14

hmm ... ecm mods of +60%, +65%, +70% would be fairer

Can`t be allowing guards to be missile immune!
Otherwise, range 8 garnet is nice, and the scanner reductions are moderate.
And L class hull was low before, so no change in hull is ok.

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 08:19 AM #13

wooo !

T ThePansy

22/02/2007 · 08:14 AM #12

LOL Maraudian!!!!

*readies sexy party balloons XD

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 07:55 AM #11

heh i havent even worked out the prs yet this is just an outline so you can all shout at me what you want , then ill edit the posts untill you all go YAY SEXY SHIPS and then we will work out the prs and stuff so you can have a sexy party for these ships or something :-o

A Archaeoptyrex

22/02/2007 · 07:44 AM #10

please post the pr`s -- not everyone has access to greenyedi internal =)
Thanks!

A AlphaCentauri

22/02/2007 · 07:43 AM #9

yea can u post pr`s of these ships like arch said so we can get a better idea ?

M MaraudianOP

22/02/2007 · 07:41 AM #8

and you dont like the multi dmg , thats fine that can be removed :/

Reply