07/12/2006 · 04:13 AM
#31
At the same time, if we hold off inventing new cures. If we let the diseases of this world run their course there are two positive outcomes.
1. There will be a major decline in human population, less resources will be used, and the earth will be able to rebuild itself.
2. The viruses will have no need for positive genetic mutations. The weak mutations will survive just as well as the strong, and the whole of the virus will begin to weaken, just as the modern human is physically weaker than our ancestors, so the virus will be weaker. THEN if we have managed to re-route our planets destruction, we should look into cures. An advanced cure for an old, obsolete sickness is a better cure, than on a sickness that will just come back stronger than ever.
I have not once argued that stemcells are wrong. I have argued that the worldwide debates on such topics as this are ignorant. The world needs to wake up and take a good look around.
People say, the world isnt in that bad of shape, the environment can take one more for the team. Let me give you a real world picture of what kind of shape the world is in.
I live in Florida. A few miles from one of the most popular beaches in the world. Every day people swim in this water, fish from the pier, go boating, ect. ect. ect.
These people get ready to eat, or need to wash their hands for some reason. NOONE is going to think twice before just washing their hands off in the ocean.
Say you came to the beach, right down the road from my house. And you had a bucket. Now as.sume that you put the bucket into the water and pulled it up. You now have a bucket full of water right?
Now pour that water back into the ocean. Guess what. By law, you have just polluted the water. THAT IS HOW TOXIC THE WATER IS.
Now. Noone is going to arrest you for it, that would be pretty not-smart. But legally, any substance with a certain amount of toxic chemicals in it cannot be put into the water because it is considered pollution.
*t