28/10/2006 · 06:51 AM
#46
I`m am genuinely upset to here of your Mother shibumi. I`ve been away in London today and come back to see you`ve had a force restart for botting. After reading this thread and from my past experience with you, I have to say to everyone that for now Im on shibumi`s side. I really could not believe this guy could be botting, i`ve personally seen him on this game for so many hours being responsive and whatever, hes just on this thing all the time! The guy himself is a machine lol. Until I see some proof, (and I doubt Pandy would actually take this action without some evidence) I doubt very much you were botting mate.
Its very sad to see a great empire who poses a challenge everytime he climbs the ranks and an empire that brings alot of life and gameplay to the game taken away like this. I can undertand how alot of the time you can be to busy to answer PMs for various reasons, and I think this method of identifiying botters isn`t sound at all.
Then I see you`ve for some reason tried to drag DISTEMPER into this and talk about an UW you were planning... To even claim Pandy is in any way supporting dist is ridiculous. I really don`t think that was very respectable to bring to the table.
How do we handle this botting issue once and for all?. Instead of spending all this time and accusations trying to stop botting, why not incorporate it? I was thinking of a system where you could put your account into a bot mode for say x hours, and the system would use turns for you on say research, but you would generate turns at a much slower rate, but none the less get to put turns to use that you wouldn`t normally get to use... Maybe this is somthing to be looked into because as it stands I think we have a very sketchy, uneffective way of preventing botting and indentifying it. Its unfair that there will be people out there getting away with it, while shibumi has been punished... And if hes indeed innnocent this is even worse. Sorry to see you go, a good player n worthy enemy