✦ GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index › General Discussion › exploring the 5000`s

exploring the 5000`s

Started by Meklon · 26/10/2006 · 10:20 PM · 16 replies · 0 reads
M MeklonOP
OP 26/10/2006 · 10:20 PM
Everyday my playing time is around the time when exploring is in the 5000 range. Everyone knows this is the worst range and the likelyhood of finding anything worthwhile is not worth the effort. Lately I have explored for a couple of minutes in this range only to come back an hour later and STILL be in the 5000`s. If everyone does their part and explore a few to get us into the 7-9 range then everyone can benefit. Dont rely on newbies to work their way through it.

The Management
S Sinarya
05/11/2006 · 06:38 PM
I don t understand that whe should i explore to get those?
D Darkshot
30/10/2006 · 03:25 AM
E.0548 Border Colony Barren 10 10 50 1,999 2,000 0 Terran Metal

But this doesn`t count :P
S SweetestDownfall
29/10/2006 · 11:37 PM
why dont we start comparing notes then..post your largest planets and their id..just a suggestion
E.7613 U.Large 11,330
E.7604 U.Large 9,614
E.5634 U.Large 8,602
D Darkshot
29/10/2006 · 04:08 AM
For me the best exploring range is always 0000 - 2000, once someone told me same ID`s got the same kind of planet, anyone can confirm this?
E Evane
28/10/2006 · 12:24 AM
Well you can find any planet anywhere Loof. However, I have noticed higher chances with finding bigger planets/U planets in certain number ranges. It could just be coincidence. Kind of like I have better luck with excavating artifacts if no one is doing a UW.
E EvilLoof
27/10/2006 · 10:24 PM
You have discovered a new planet !
Name E.5825
Useable land 986
Available ore 10
Mineral Red Crystal
Planet type Barren

lol hmm
E EvilLoof
27/10/2006 · 10:19 PM
You have discovered a new planet !
Name E.5788
Useable land 1004
Available ore 31
Mineral White Crystal
Planet type Barren
D Deiloche
27/10/2006 · 07:48 AM
There`s always the possibility I`m wrong... but I have never noticed a pattern in my exploring tendencies. And I`ve explored a lot of planets... on turn based, as well, where you go on exploring sprees with a load of turns, rather than slowly using your turns as you get them. I could be wrong, I s`pose. *Shrugs*
M mallow
27/10/2006 · 07:30 AM
ask steven i dont know if he`ll ever get round to answering but its the only way to truely know, and i never knew ids had anything to do with it, i mean how would it make a difference? i thought that exploration was purely random
D Deiloche
27/10/2006 · 04:55 AM
Pretty sure IDs are irrelevant. I say that with the authority of the GC turnbased explore king. :P
A AlphaCentauri
27/10/2006 · 04:54 AM
i never knew id`s mattered either... interesting
M Macbeth
27/10/2006 · 03:27 AM
I never knew the IDs effected anything, are you guys sure?
H Hellus
27/10/2006 · 01:14 AM
lol i can see exploring during these times becoming a popular past time now, i always thought it was just random
Z Zenith
27/10/2006 · 01:12 AM
What`s this? Planet IDs?

Interesting idea...

I know my 2 land spaz is X. 9664
E Evane
26/10/2006 · 11:34 PM
The 0xxx-1xxx range is very profitable as well. I`d say 9xxx to 0xxx is where the large barrens are at. 2xxx-6xxx are bad.
G Gilead
26/10/2006 · 11:20 PM
what are you talking about? are you even talking about GC???

Reply

⚠
You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.