GC FORUM Galactic Conquest
Sign in
Back to the Game
Forum Index General Discussion Is GC too Balanced?

Is GC too Balanced?

Started by Deathroe · 12/11/2015 · 11:15 AM · 8 replies · 0 reads
D DeathroeOP
I`ve been reading some of the recent Topics, and people usually `harkin` back to previous years - Like a large V Borr. stack taking out 500 Mill of a UW stack, V-Borr with a Range of 9.

And, back in the day, Viral could reverse engineer some D-Class.

So, Maybe we should be looking back, when there were a lot more players - and - maybe - it was the ImBalance which created excitement, the opportunity to put the Hurt on your Foe???

Just a thought. Would it be too crazy to think of a different Server that was like GC-RT back on 2005?

Thanks for your consideration and thoughtful reply :)

D.R.
H Helms{}Deep
Bring back old UC- one system with many planets, 6 stacks... that was the best
Q qwerty360
Vintage rt with maximum seen active player count would iirc predate the introduction of viral and collective...

Change it back to pre viral/coll and 6 ship stacks...
Z Zexion
Hmm. As much as I would like to see that happen, BW and EE ARE the guys in charge. We must wait for them to reach a decision.
T ThEpAkIsTaNiEmPirE
Yeah I agree watch BW and EE`S magic they are working hard as we speak.
A AdmiralSarek
It could make an interesting event on the death match server
S Spaceboy
I suppose we should just sit tight and watch BW and EEs magic
E EternalWolf
A vintage RT server would be pretty freakn sweet. Unnerfed ships.. old v borr, old ruby, old nirv, old lyth, etc... like GC as it was pre first update with the exception of turns ofc. 20 turns for a free account is a bit light lol.

Also add the proposed cluster explore rules. Maybe add DM explore rules too. Like slightly bigger planets and maybe ones with random loyalty too. So what if its all OP... ban gordoes and even the playing field, everyone is paid.

Reply

You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.