Enslavement,

Alright I may be wrong, and if I am, I apologize for the false accusations.

Sometimes admin rulings can just be hard to understand when you get something like "the reason this happened was due to a previously unknown and never again seen bug in the game".

But back to the issue... Enslavement...

honestly it all goes back to the same sort of crab like happened with me.

everyone would go "He pt`d his c3`s it`s not fair" then admins who actually looked into it at that time would see they infact were not pt`s then admins are in the wrong..

Fact is people have bias against other people always will be the case.. but i can say without a doubt that if i were the one who had the final ruling on this case i would`ve ruled the same as was decided in the end by all who looked it over.. and i can say that for anyone who would`ve been in this circumstance.. but i`m also someone who believes in getting proof of facts before acting.. As generally i`m opposed to punishing people who are/could be innocent.

But hey who needs to be a fair admin when i can just side with people opposed to facts.. Sibi you honestly disappoint me. and GA honestly handle this how you want i don`t care right now..

lol.. Dude i tried to pt awhile ago and got punished for it.


You tried to do a PT once, but took an arrow to the knee.

Edited by RauLeCreuset on 2012-03-03

Well Raist I would be happy to know that everything happened by the book, and there were no reason to point fingers, But I doubt I could make a legitimate HC thread now since it happened so long ago that I dont remember the date.

But it is not so much to point fingers, more to point out that there are ways to go around the rules transfering planets/cash/whatever without breaking the writting rules, and thus not getting black listed. I have always found this to be borderline cheating, but it has been pointed out numerous times by staff to be okay. That is why 60 day old collectives can do UWs on TB servers for instance and carry galleon over to whatever chosen race.

GameAdmin: Rules are enforced in the manner that Stephen dictates he also made and wrote the rules as well as how staff are to handle each case

Edited by GameAdmin on 2012-03-03

There`s new admins UC side, they can review the old case notes as well if you`d like. Since I don`t even know UC staff, there would not be a single chance for anyone to call it bias. If you would like to do this, then please open a HC thread, and I will contact GameAdmin to assign a UC staff to the case.

I`m only explaining this in a public thread because I feel you are justified in wanting answers, and I`m more than willing to help provide them for you. However I still have to enforce the rules and ask that you keep accusations off the public forums.

Thanks,

Raist

GameAdmin: This was also personally looked into by me and i am sick and tired of hearing this across the forums an my own private message box none of you can seem to accept the word of 3 admins on the subject

Continue it again you`ll get a 3 day turn suspend no appeals will be entertained same goes for everyone else who continues to bring this up.
BadWolf: Not about to allow this GA there is NO need to go into the extremes.

Your complaints belong in Ask > Abuse > Complain against Guide/Admins, Ask > Abuse > Report Cheating

However this has already been looked into by staff repeatedly. Accept it or don`t i no longer care. But do not continue to bring it up in the forum or my private message box and no im not referring to you about my private message box but those who i am referring to know who they are.

Edited by GameAdmin on 2012-03-03

Edited by DarthVader on 2012-03-03

Anytime we find someone who PT`d , we handle it accordingly. MastaKilla if you suspect someone of doing as such, please make a HC thread with the details.

Thanks!

Planet trading isnt needed,,, for most guard empires that is ofc, some still do it while staff doesnt care.

Guards are terribly unbalanced imo, It is too easy to gordo a massive guard on RT, while for guards on TB its much harder to get a decent income.

I would love to enslave guardians and PUNISH THEM! I would watch them cry as their 3800 loyalty on 500k land drop to zer0. It would balance the guardian race and nobody would even consider planet trading for loyalty on guardians.

I lost an attack on Saga due to reinforcements. Not that it is a huge deal, but the one time I was able to catch him above 5000 he got an 11th stack of Nirv. :(

don`t leave out the point that some empires want to be enslaved b/c it is OP! :D

or it could me oh ph**k... No... thats not a nice joke.

OP can also mean original post.... but here, its over powered.

I always thought op means one piece..

U deathroe troll.. me crack goblin..

Overpowered Deathroe

Sorry - I am a newbie - what does OP mean ??

Generally OP means Over Powered.

Edited by RauLeCreuset on 2012-03-01

The only tweaks that enslavement really should get would involve intensive coding from stephen and makes it rather null and void point to bring up tbh as with most things in GC.

Yeh but they would be OP, due to their ship upkeep... I can imagine a maru 2 days old with a TAX miner slave going up and down the ranks lol. Sounds right up their ally indeed.. but i highly doubt any of this can be implemented.

Marauder would make sense... I mean they maraud and pillage and plunder. Then sacrifice virgins and newborn kittens. Slavery sounds right up their alley.

Agreed.. .Its just fine with miner and terran. I think it could be implemented to maybe viral ?