Vote for Admin

if i cant have TBK ill take Kelti for head admin.

my: 30 gordos

for

your: 1 month RT coupon

Yawnz..

Flashy for admin!

I`d vote for me. And since I`m worth it, i`d drain the accounts to pay one week`s salary...then I`d promise massive updating once the fees cover the salary draws. Of course, i`d also give myself a huge U Large and max out the gordos time and again ... oh, and develop a death ray to use one anyone whenever I deemed it necessary.

Omeg.. I do know about the proposed change.. Im still in disfavour..

Changes for the sake of changing is not the solution for me.. Tweak them though.. 2times their br seems too radical.. If u get what i mean..

*Points Crack to the Perm BR thread* that will discuss a small framework plus it would be like a live test to see if we see improvement.

I should mention that is not set in stone or anything at this time.

Edited by Omegian on 2011-08-24

So true that my hp does a double posts.. I know bout chain of command.. But a guide who is neutral and play at least 1 tb will be a better admin than one who see gc as only rt.. You have your own mind though im still in disfavour in regards to the proposed of increase buildrates to certain types of ships.. Tweak them yes.. Having 2x them does seem radical though..

Meh, Crack thanks for the vote, however I would refrain from Admin or even powers that of Admin, been an admin and seen hell and back on games. I am fine with my chores as a guide/ship mod jocky.

Plus, I am always a person who believes an Admin job is just temporary if not rotational anyhow. However, people still need to progress up the Chain of Command to get admin heh.

*Edited* -

Reason: doublepost

Edited by Omegian on 2011-08-24

Normally the position of admin goes to the guide who couldnt care more..

Omeg will be a good choice.. Though it will be good if one of tb player goes for a guide..

I was being less detailed here as It has already been reiterated and discussed upteen times in the Perm BR thread. That thread and this discussion are pretty much showing the same stuff. There are multiple ways of tackling the issues, however I rather do the Perm BR upgrade with guardian tweaks to kill 2 birds with 1 stone in terms of a large update for all ships and their tweaks for balancing issues. However at this time I am just waiting and seeing what the word is on all as I could care less what is going on in the game.

Edited by Omegian on 2011-08-24

Omeg : the way to decrease the hull`s is either change the shield mod`s or increase the scanner rating while decreasing hull to keep the power aprox the same as it is

Hmms, Kelt, the more balanced way is to approach the guards by reducing their hulls, not their BR`s, because as I had explained in the BR Post a few weeks ago, that with the cruisers/destroyers/etc of other ships (not guardians) being increased, that would make a difference against guardians and their BRs, given you tweak ships mods and stuff. Just my opinion of how I was going to tackle the issue.

*surprise twist ending for bladeliger*

_*Blade{}Liger orders a bag full of popcorn then takes a cold can of soda and starts reading the Thread. ^_^

for guardian`s ships there are 2 choices reduce their hull and keep their current build rate
Or keep the current hull/power ratio and reduce their build rate

GalacticMercenaries how am i a "cheating blank" ?

i am not voting for kelti to be admin to make gaurds better, he would make them be worse if he was admin ???

guard`s build rates can be fixed by reducing the hull which in turn will reduce it`s power per turn

P. Zues is nice the way it is.. If at same pr and range.. Increasing bits of hull will make quite a fair bit of decrease weapon..

Terrans ship are one of the most balanced.. Guards br need to be nerfed.. Just slightly.. 5 to 15percent..