Most Valuable Ship (MVS)

You`re not even going to post power ratings? You sir, are a tool.

all you have proven is that dams don`t work and the better fleet wins Hal is still an awesome ship

@BadWolf - check and mate


Ankaar`s fleet
M.Hal Fighter 4,136 4,136 0

Colonies Captured
Name Type Land Size
E.5410 Icy 11
C1.5372 Cluster Lvl 1 734
C2.1378 Cluster Lvl 2 5,080


Ankaar`s fleet
M.Hal Fighter 22,224 22,224 0
G.Lictor Juggernaught 9 9 0
M.Chlorite Destroyer 320 320 0
M.Epidote Destroyer 369 369 0
G.Livid (r) Fighter 22 22 0
M.Alium Corvette 5,000 5,000 0
F.Sword Destroyer 148 148 0
Strafez Queen 39 39 0

Colonies Captured
Name Type Land Size
E.7886 Balanced 534
E.7885 Balanced 537
E.5439 Icy 98

M.Hal

imo.... people think a ship is bad if you can`t spam it... three stack or six stack

You just dont know how to use it matrix...great ship as a flanker...as is herc...both ships do great low in stack..although most spam herc or lead it..i found it lot harder to kill in the 6,7,8 spot..emp same thing. try it that way youll become a fan also =)

Yeah emp is pretty bad. It`s basically a bad version of the miner`s aragonite that builds half as fast and has no defence slapped on

cuz they dont know how to use it. Emp sucks. either i dont know how to use THAT, or it simply sucks.

"The herc wasn`t nerfed... it used to have 48k PR, same wep/hull and a -75% chem shield instead of -30%. If anything, it`s been made more powerful."

it used to be 45k pr and 2 unit built per turn. the only ship for me to counter guardian, marauder and quick pr jump. seriously, i dont really care on the -75% chem shield. i already get used to it with Terran weak on chem dmg :)

"idk T. Kalieum has become increasingly useful lately..."

just because not much Terran use it ;p

i would vote for T.Emp. it is still as suck as it is even it had been tune better ;p

look in the manual

if a ship doesn`t have: no defence, it can retal...

you being serious deathroe? If it doesn`t say anything it means it doesn`t have any retal

whoever said i was sane? and ive had a large degree of sucess with it

meh, fenrir has way better stats and no-retal to boot. It`s also energy/kin which makes a difference. I don`t think that any sane person will argue that kal is better :P

kals on their own do fine but the fens add the extra punch. kal has that nice ecm and chem defense that make it tough.

fenrir is nice. great def mods. kal is better tho in my opinion. but i will point out that a 10 stack with flankers at the bottom and a fen/kal 1 & 2 stack will knock a viral around a good bit.

terrans have fenrir..which is a pretty nice ship.

The herc wasn`t nerfed... it used to have 48k PR, same wep/hull and a -75% chem shield instead of -30%. If anything, it`s been made more powerful.

herc USED to be an amazing ship. It was amazing in that it pissed off the virals and such... So much so that it got nerfed down to where it is now. Gee thanks you losers.... Now we get to hear about how great the Pike and Angel and Tourm and what-not....and what to us lil terrans get? Hmm?? ........Thor........and thats about it. (Kal in my case and Odin and Garuda when used correctly). Herc got nerfed. Un nerf it. Now.