I have three suggestions that I believe would bring about serious change in the activity levels of the game, the level of skill required to play it, and suggestions that would help to fix some of the issues with the games economy.
1.) Make C3`s not able to be plundered.
2.) Every month you spend without exiting DP (ex: VM or frozen,) you lose your outermost c3. If you don`t have any nothing to worry about.
3.) Remove minor gordos from the game.
All our problems will be solved.
/discuss, but before you do know that I am right and unless you agree with me you are wrong.
K GO
Renren`s Suggestions Thread
Started by Islander
· 05/02/2011 · 01:46 PM
· 32 replies
· 1 read
#1 is an ok idea, however i think letting Maru/Collective plunder those C3s wouldnt be that bad, give them the plunder money.
#2 people VM for actually being busy in RL, but yes we all know some VM to protect those C3s which should be against the rules.
#3 This idea is years to late, and it cant be taken away now or you give newer empires a disadvantage in the long run. Im sure alot of players would quit if minor gordo disappeared and im sure Stephen would shut down the game since thats the main trading item for paids in this game.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So #1 is actually an ok idea. #2-3 are plain not-smart ideas i dont think anyone would really go for.
#2 people VM for actually being busy in RL, but yes we all know some VM to protect those C3s which should be against the rules.
#3 This idea is years to late, and it cant be taken away now or you give newer empires a disadvantage in the long run. Im sure alot of players would quit if minor gordo disappeared and im sure Stephen would shut down the game since thats the main trading item for paids in this game.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So #1 is actually an ok idea. #2-3 are plain not-smart ideas i dont think anyone would really go for.
wonder if taking things away will help in retain/attract players.. imagine a player have a c3, 2c2 below that. if he cant plunder the c3 to explore, he might jus get killed..
sure initially there will be more players to play since vm is not viable and ppl are force to keep playing.. then existing player don like it and leave, and gc don have much new player to replace... so do u think it`s good for gc in the long run??
sure initially there will be more players to play since vm is not viable and ppl are force to keep playing.. then existing player don like it and leave, and gc don have much new player to replace... so do u think it`s good for gc in the long run??
I`ve suggested removing minor gordos many times. It`s a good idea in theory, that`s probably never going to happen though. It would give those who already have gordoed planets a huge advantage, unless you are willing to take away all their land (thus prolly making them quit)
Also, as for losing planets in VM, I think the more serious issue is with things like VM building, not necessarily perma VM. If someone is serious about maintaining their clusters, then good for them. Otherwise when they forget to renew VM, the planets they have are up for grabs (You would know, right?). In a weird way, idea #2 goes against idea #1 in that you`d want to see C3s disapear if people are going inactive but not if they are active...
Also, as for losing planets in VM, I think the more serious issue is with things like VM building, not necessarily perma VM. If someone is serious about maintaining their clusters, then good for them. Otherwise when they forget to renew VM, the planets they have are up for grabs (You would know, right?). In a weird way, idea #2 goes against idea #1 in that you`d want to see C3s disapear if people are going inactive but not if they are active...
R
Ragnarok
Umm, can you go make your suggestions to Stephen?
On the other hand, maybe that`s not a good idea. He might ruin it with a bit of mis-coding or something. Don`t want that Stephen math to strike again now would we. xD
On the other hand, maybe that`s not a good idea. He might ruin it with a bit of mis-coding or something. Don`t want that Stephen math to strike again now would we. xD
F
FOUNDERS
1. i agree this is a good idea, i would allow only maru to plunder them as this would encourage more ppl to play maru if there were plenty c3`s on borders.
2. maybe lose 10% of resources, cash and infra for 15 days vm/frozen, 50% for 21 days
. thus you dont punish any1 who goes on a 14 night vacation as they can vm for 14 days and have enough borders to cover a day or 2 extra.
3. keep gordo
2. maybe lose 10% of resources, cash and infra for 15 days vm/frozen, 50% for 21 days
. thus you dont punish any1 who goes on a 14 night vacation as they can vm for 14 days and have enough borders to cover a day or 2 extra.
3. keep gordo
Mmm ...
#1
I think it`s a fair decision as long as you still can kill the population and infrastructures on the cluster level 3 so that it is only useful to A Miners who would hopefully produce more minerals.
So if the idea is to create a self sufficient mineral market ... it`s an interesting idea
#2
I think its a good idea to have some sort of penalty for spending 30 days in dp though loosing your cluster is harsh.
I remembered there was a federation Army of Darkness in which all their members are VMers and it`s really to me just another way to play the game.
#3
Remove minor gordos with that i believe you will loose plenty of players from the asia region.
In Summary i sort of see these changes as trying to bring back old UC which was in effect very good as i myself first started playing old UC then jump to GC and never looked back...
#1
I think it`s a fair decision as long as you still can kill the population and infrastructures on the cluster level 3 so that it is only useful to A Miners who would hopefully produce more minerals.
So if the idea is to create a self sufficient mineral market ... it`s an interesting idea
#2
I think its a good idea to have some sort of penalty for spending 30 days in dp though loosing your cluster is harsh.
I remembered there was a federation Army of Darkness in which all their members are VMers and it`s really to me just another way to play the game.
#3
Remove minor gordos with that i believe you will loose plenty of players from the asia region.
In Summary i sort of see these changes as trying to bring back old UC which was in effect very good as i myself first started playing old UC then jump to GC and never looked back...
So...with these changes the ONLY way to get rid of C3`s, EVER, would be to go in VM mode for 30 days? I am collective atm.. I have no interest in your C3s except for you to not have them and for me to plunder for a few million dollars.
B
boudicca
#1 = great idea
#2 = maybe change it to someone not exiting dp for 30 days is just fully restarted "this overall would cause more activity"
#3 = you gotta be crazy if the removed gordos, a ton of people would stop playing for that reason.
#2 = maybe change it to someone not exiting dp for 30 days is just fully restarted "this overall would cause more activity"
#3 = you gotta be crazy if the removed gordos, a ton of people would stop playing for that reason.
T
Tikimana
Cluster1 / Similare2: 5 turns
Cluster2 / Similare3: 10 turns
Cluster3 / Similare4: 25 turns
Similare5: 50 turns
Cluster2 / Similare3: 10 turns
Cluster3 / Similare4: 25 turns
Similare5: 50 turns
I think these are just wonderful ideas, really the best I have seen in so very long, it`s great that some players are still thinking of wonderful and original ways to improve this game. Islander I would like to be the first to thank you for the time and thought you put into these ideas and most of all for sharing it with the rest of us so that one day this game could be just that much more enjoyable for us all to play.
Plunder isn`t really an idea that needs balancing around. Agri maru`s will have a field day with this.
And I haven`t seen those first two points every really suggested like this, and I been here awhile.
And I haven`t seen those first two points every really suggested like this, and I been here awhile.
same old story.
cept this one seems original and illogical enough comment on:
make C3s not able to be plundered = how will some marus make cash :P
cept this one seems original and illogical enough comment on:
make C3s not able to be plundered = how will some marus make cash :P
Page 2 of 2
Reply
⚠
You must sign in before you can reply.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.
Sign in to the game and come back — the forum uses your game account.