END enslavement

OP 25/01/2011 · 02:20 PM #1

Seriously we heard more than enough complaints about enslavement over the years especially the 10x power thingy & the VMing empires.

I say we do away with it, yes its part of the game, but only A.miner/Terran are able to use it mainly, and it only works on Commercial/Tax A.miner/Terran. Which is unfair if you enslave a mineral A.miner or a food producer or goods producer and you dont get any profits from them.

Im sure other people can think of other reasons to END enslavement as part of the game, and i`ll be glad when its gone.

D DrKsTGuArDiAn

26/01/2011 · 06:50 AM #25

The only way u should break enslavement is to roll doubles or have a get out of enslavement free card.

N nedflanders

26/01/2011 · 06:15 AM #24

Jammer doesn`t want guardian loyalty to be changed, because he was able to do missions twice, meaning that he has more loyalty than otherwise possible.

I`m a firm believer that guards should be allowed to loyalty their own planets up to around 2000 or so (not the complete 5000). But that`ll prolly never happen.

T ThEpAkIsTaNiEmPirE

26/01/2011 · 06:12 AM #23

So Jammer enlighten us, why was it disabled for guardians ?

Rewarding For guardians shouldnt be a bad thing, it would just increase the Cash. More cash making abilities, would mean more people for goods and Minerals. More demand, could fix alot of the market problems we are having.

B boudicca

26/01/2011 · 05:39 AM #22

Lol freelancer you would need stephen for far more then just that, to make any other race enslave-able would require stephen

and HB, i love the dry humor

M Mazuku

26/01/2011 · 05:14 AM #21

well i suppose you could restore/create a loyalty giving artifact and the one that kills loyalty. That would kinda balance it all out. Just make the one that gives loyalty harder to create than the one to kill it. I`m not sure how much coding that would require, I wouldn`t think it`d be terribly hard.

I`m not how balanced that`d be but it`s a thought. And you`d have something new to max out jammer :P

J Jammer

26/01/2011 · 03:45 AM #20

No, if you give rewarding back to guards, we`ll all suddenly make a ton more money, I`m not against that, but there`s a reason it was removed.

F FreelancerOP

26/01/2011 · 03:08 AM #19

If everyone is enslave-able

We got the production of (Minerals,food,goods,raw) sharing issue to fix.

Making guards enslave-able, is alright, as for the punishment part, disabling that for guard would required Stephen, however if we ENABLE guard to reward their planet loyalty, its an easy fix to the issue there.

So Yes END ENSLAVEMENT --OR-- Or make it fair for everyone.

T TheEdge

26/01/2011 · 02:44 AM #18

my only imput is that i have alway thought that either every and all races should be able to enslave and be enslaved.

SO i say if that cant be the case then why have it at all.

You know that even though we talk about this what was said before stand true unless the game owners are reading this or we have a whole ton of peeps trying to get it changed it will just remain the same.

J Jammer

26/01/2011 · 02:01 AM #17

I wouldn`t care if you made guards enslave-able, but just make punishment not kill loyalty, I worked hard for what I have, and can`t just reward to get it back.

T ThEpAkIsTaNiEmPirE

26/01/2011 · 01:03 AM #16

Keep slavery, modify what you get from the slaves. Like obtaining credits, we should obtain productions and goods, and Guard/Viral should be part of the slave trade. So should Coll/Maru. But thats another story. No punishing for Guard empires *so we don`t drop loyalty. I think Stephen made the paid races non enslave able and collective, so more people go "Paid" status.

W wingnut

26/01/2011 · 12:54 AM #15

keep enslavement.

H HoneyBucket{HH}

26/01/2011 · 12:41 AM #14

Maybe we need a GC Civil Rights movement.

F FOUNDERS

26/01/2011 · 12:32 AM #13

the only problem i ever saw with enslavement is vming but that is not a problem now as if you are enslaved and your master vms admins will release you.

B boudicca

25/01/2011 · 11:54 PM #12

I think all races should be able to enslave, and be enslaved, this is a war game after all.

Player friendly? if you want a player friendly game maybe you should go play teletubies on ps1 or something?

S ShatterdDreams

25/01/2011 · 11:27 PM #11

on the contrary i think enslavement should be extended to guards, so we can punish them and drop their loyalty.

J Jammer

25/01/2011 · 11:27 PM #10

I`m A. Miner on all other servers o.o

V VALJA

25/01/2011 · 11:25 PM #9

glad you`re happy with enslavement Jammer... and i`m glad that you`re not facing any enslavement since i noticed you`re a guardian in RT... i`m not sure what race you`re playing in other servers but IF you`re happy with enslavement and reinforcement, i`m still glad to see that... :)

i`m happy to be a terran but i`m not happy with enslavement in SFGC... and i don`t wish to change to another race any sooner or at all...

heck... why i bother at all eh...? :)

D DrKsTGuArDiAn

25/01/2011 · 11:19 PM #8

*enslaves jammer, then sends him some light frigit reinforcements

J Jammer

25/01/2011 · 11:08 PM #7

Honestly, they don`t take too much of your money, you can live with a chunk of cash missing. If you make enough for it to be a ton of cash that they are getting then climb up and break free, while you`re headed up you`ll go negative, and that`ll stop them from getting anything from you anyway. If they are too high, talk to your friends and get them to knock him down, or you can tell him you`ll make him money if he sends reinforcements

reinforcements are amazing, especially at low power.

V VALJA

25/01/2011 · 09:29 PM #6

true chessRPGrulerKoA... it`s an unsuccessful effort to abolish enslavement in SFGC... but it`s no longer any concern to me anymore... it`s not my loss...

infact, it`s not any loss at all to new players or any player who feel disappointed and just move away frm SFGC due to enslavement... it`s the game developers` loss when they won`t listen to player`s grouses and complaints... these players can bring their money to other games which it`s more player-friendly...

Reply